According to Bloomberg Business, the A$1.9 billion RQI Australian Value Fund is outperforming the market by treating ESG credentials as indicators of corporate efficiency and profitability. Senior quant portfolio manager Joanna Nash revealed that the fund uses factors like corporate culture and climate impact in its stock selection process. The strategy comes from RQI Investors, which is the quantitative arm of First Sentier Investors. The fund has beaten its benchmark across multiple time horizons, showing consistent performance. This approach positions ESG factors not as ethical choices but as practical business efficiency signals.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The ESG Performance Question
Here’s the thing about ESG investing – we’ve seen this movie before. Remember when everyone was convinced that “doing good” automatically meant better returns? Then reality hit. The problem isn’t that ESG factors are useless – it’s that they’re incredibly difficult to measure objectively. Corporate culture? Climate impact? These are squishy metrics that even experts can’t agree on how to quantify.
And let’s talk about that “multiple time horizons” claim. What exactly does that mean? Is it three months? Three years? The Australian market has been pretty volatile lately, so outperformance could just mean they got lucky with timing. I’m not saying they’re wrong, but quant strategies live and die by their backtesting. What happens when market conditions change dramatically?
The Quant Angle
Now, using ESG factors in a quantitative framework is actually pretty clever. Traditional ESG investing often feels like checking boxes – does the company have a diversity policy? Are they carbon neutral? But treating these as efficiency signals is different. Basically, they’re saying companies with better cultures and environmental practices simply run tighter ships.
But here’s my question: how do you avoid greenwashing? Companies are getting really good at ESG theater – putting out fancy reports and making big announcements while their actual operations might tell a different story. A quant model might miss the nuance between real cultural improvement and polished PR.
The Sustainability Question
Look, I want this to work. The idea that being responsible actually makes businesses more profitable is compelling. But we’ve seen quant strategies blow up before when their factors stop working. Remember smart beta? Factor investing? Everything works until it doesn’t.
The real test will be whether this approach can survive a major market downturn or period of high inflation. When companies are struggling to survive, do ESG factors still predict performance? Or do they become luxury items that get cut first? That’s when we’ll really know if this is a durable strategy or just another quant fad.
For now, it’s definitely worth watching RQI Investors and seeing if their approach holds up. If they can consistently prove that ESG equals efficiency, it could change how everyone thinks about sustainable investing.
