According to MakeUseOf, private browsing modes like Chrome’s Incognito have been misleading users since their introduction in 2008. These features were originally designed for shared computers, not personal privacy, and merely delete local browsing history while allowing extensive tracking to continue. A 2017 Princeton/Stanford study matched over 70% of participants to their social media profiles using incognito browsing data, while a 2020 UCL study found users dramatically overestimate the privacy these modes provide. The reality is that ISPs, employers, websites, and governments can still see everything you do in private mode through IP tracking, browser fingerprinting, and network monitoring.
The Privacy Placebo Effect
Here’s the thing about private browsing: it’s basically a psychological trick. The dark window, the “Incognito” branding, the lack of history – it all creates this illusion of security. But the technical reality is completely different. Your browser still sends your IP address to every website. It still allows fingerprinting through your screen resolution, fonts, and hardware details. And your ISP? They’re logging every domain you visit regardless of what mode you’re in.
Think about it this way: if you walked into a store wearing a disguise but still used your credit card and driver’s license, would you be anonymous? Of course not. That’s essentially what private browsing does – it gives you a superficial disguise while all your identifying information remains completely visible to anyone who knows how to look.
Who Can Still See Everything
So who’s actually watching when you think you’re being private? Basically everyone. Your internet provider sees every site you visit and can sell that data to advertisers. Websites fingerprint your browser using dozens of technical details that make your device unique. Employers monitoring their networks see your traffic in real time. And trackers follow your unique device ID across sessions.
The UCL study found people associate private browsing with everything from encrypted communications to virus protection – none of which it actually provides. It’s become this catch-all term for security when it’s really just local history cleanup.
What Actually Works for Privacy
Now for the good news: real privacy tools do exist, they’re just not the ones built into your browser. VPNs encrypt your connection from your device to the VPN server, hiding your activity from ISPs and local networks. Privacy-focused browsers like Brave strip trackers by default. Tor Browser routes traffic through multiple encryption layers for true anonymity. And tools like uBlock Origin block ads and tracking scripts before they can load.
But here’s the catch: there’s no magic button for privacy. It requires using multiple tools together and understanding what each one actually does. A VPN alone won’t stop browser fingerprinting. A privacy browser won’t hide your activity from your ISP. You need layers of protection.
Time to Reset Expectations
The biggest problem with private browsing isn’t the feature itself – it’s the branding. Calling something “Incognito” or “Private” when it provides minimal actual privacy has created two decades of misunderstanding. Companies like Google benefit from this confusion because it makes users feel secure while data collection continues uninterrupted.
Maybe it’s time browsers were more honest about what these modes actually do. Instead of “Private Browsing,” call it “Local History-Free Browsing.” Instead of “Incognito,” call it “No-Trace Mode.” The Princeton research shows how easily supposedly anonymous data can be re-identified anyway. So why keep pretending?
Look, if you’re using private mode to hide birthday gifts from family members or prevent your search history from cluttering your main browser – great! It works perfectly for that. But if you’re trying to hide from advertisers, your employer, or anyone else? You’re basically just wearing a disguise that everyone can see through.

I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.