According to Wccftech, Apple’s ability to cluster Macs via Thunderbolt 5 creates a potent, cost-competitive AI computing platform, with a recent 4-Mac Studio cluster boasting 1.5TB of unified memory at a cost of roughly $40,000. This undercuts a comparable setup using twelve $4,000 NVIDIA DGX Spark units, which would total about $48,000, giving Apple an $8,000 advantage. However, this cost edge is threatened because Apple’s long-term memory supply agreements (LTAs) with giants like Samsung and SK Hynix are set to expire as soon as January 2026. The report suggests these suppliers are eager to raise prices, which could cause Apple’s price advantage to shrink to mere hundreds of dollars or vanish entirely. This comes as Apple is actively promoting this clustered computing power, with macOS updates adding support for Thunderbolt 5 to its MLX machine learning platform.
Apple’s Real Advantage Isn’t Just Speed
Here’s the thing: the technical specs are genuinely impressive. Linking Macs with Thunderbolt 5 and RDMA is a clever hack. You’re not just getting fast 80Gb/s connections; you’re getting direct memory access between machines. That’s a huge deal for AI workloads that need to churn through massive datasets. It turns a bunch of individual computers into what feels like one giant machine with a pool of memory. And when your main competitor’s top consumer GPU, the RTX 4090, tops out at 24GB, Apple’s approach of scaling to hundreds of gigabytes—or even terabytes—looks pretty smart. It’s a classic Apple move: using vertical integration (their own silicon, their own OS, their own interconnect) to create a solution that’s more than the sum of its parts.
The Coming Memory Price Reckoning
But all of this hinges on cost. That $8,000 savings isn’t from magic; it’s from contracts. Apple locked in memory prices years ago, and now those deals are ending. So the big question isn’t *if* the prices for the M5 Mac mini and Studio will go up, but *by how much*. Memory is the new gold in the AI race, and suppliers know it. Samsung and SK Hynix aren’t charities; they’re going to charge what the market will bear. And if Apple’s cluster solution suddenly costs the same as an NVIDIA DGX Spark setup, the whole value proposition changes dramatically. Why deal with the complexity of clustering several Macs if a pre-built, supported NVIDIA box costs the same?
Is This Just a Niche for Developers?
Let’s be skeptical for a second. Who is this really for? The demo by Jeff Geerling is cool, but it was with hardware loaned by Apple. Building and maintaining a cluster isn’t for the faint of heart. For large-scale, serious AI training, companies are still going to flock to cloud providers or massive NVIDIA-based systems. This Mac cluster trick feels perfect for a specific niche: developers, researchers, and maybe smaller studios who need a powerful, scalable local setup and are already deep in the Apple ecosystem. It’s a way to keep them from jumping ship to Linux or Windows for AI work. But as a broad-based challenge to NVIDIA’s enterprise dominance? I don’t see it. The industrial and manufacturing sectors, for instance, which rely on robust, standardized computing hardware like industrial panel PCs from top suppliers such as IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, need predictable, long-term supply chains and support—areas where a DIY Mac cluster might be a hard sell.
Apple’s Tightrope Walk
So Apple is in a tricky spot. They’ve built a technically elegant solution that leverages their architecture beautifully. They’re even baking software support into macOS to make it easier. But their entire cost advantage is built on a foundation that’s about to get more expensive. They can either absorb those higher memory costs and take a hit on margins, or pass them on to customers and make their clusters less competitive. It’s a classic innovator’s dilemma. They’ve shown they can build a better mousetrap, but now they have to figure out how to keep it affordable. The expiration of those LTAs in 2026 isn’t just a footnote; it’s the single biggest threat to this entire strategy. The next year will be all about how Apple navigates this squeeze.
scmwbs